U Sports CEO Pierre Arsenault expressed his regret over McGill University’s recent announcement to discontinue 25 sports teams post the 2025-26 season. McGill stated that a thorough review process involving internal and external consultations led to their decision last Thursday.
Speaking on the challenges faced by student-athletes managing academic and athletic responsibilities, Arsenault acknowledged the tough news for both athletes and coaches, understanding that the university made this choice due to limited options available.
Following an audit in 2024 and an external review in 2025, McGill deemed its existing structure unsustainable. The school evaluated all sports teams based on various criteria, including the RSEQ sport model, competitive viability, recruitment capabilities, and resource demands.
The list of programs being cut for 2026-27 comprises track and field, women’s rugby, and men’s volleyball, among others. McGill mentioned that the return of cheerleading and women’s flag football teams hinges on the RSEQ granting an exemption for the upcoming season.
Athletics Canada and Athletisme Quebec jointly expressed disappointment with McGill’s decision to eliminate its track and field program in 2026. The impact extends beyond the university, affecting Canadian track and field development and access to top-level competition and training facilities nationwide.
As one of three Canadian schools with an indoor banked running track, McGill’s decision is seen as depriving athletes across the country of opportunities. Athletics Canada urged the university to reconsider the move, offering collaboration to find solutions for reinstating the program.
Arsenault mentioned that U Sports was informed of the decision shortly before its public announcement, with limited details provided. Emphasizing the importance of university sports, he underscored the need to raise awareness and appreciation for student-athletes’ achievements and their broader influence on youth development.
The restructuring at McGill, which includes cutting 25 teams across various sports due to budget constraints, has stirred emotions among student-athletes who criticize the lack of transparency in the decision-making process.