As negotiations between Washington, Ukraine, and Russia intensify and President Donald Trump remains hopeful about an imminent peace agreement, key disagreements persist between Kyiv and Moscow. These disagreements revolve around the control of disputed regions in Eastern Ukraine and the provision of security assurances.
Kyiv insists on robust security guarantees to deter any future Russian aggression and seeks military support from its allies in the event of an attack. Ukraine desires binding security commitments, recalling the Budapest Memorandum signed in 1994 that failed to prevent Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 and subsequent conflict in Donbas.
Discussions include proposals for security assurances modeled after NATO’s Article 5, which stipulates collective defense among member states. While Russia has hinted at offering similar language, details remain vague. The 28-point peace plan endorsed by Moscow and Washington includes provisions for reliable security guarantees involving the U.S.
Regarding peacekeeping efforts, some allies of Kyiv, like Canada, contemplate sending troops post-ceasefire, although Russia opposes NATO presence in Eastern Ukraine. The concept of a reassurance force stationed in neighboring countries is under consideration to monitor a potential ceasefire.
The possibility of U.S. involvement in peacekeeping operations revolves around providing surveillance equipment and support from NATO territories. The Kremlin’s stance on security guarantees remains firm, emphasizing no concessions from its strategic objectives.
Despite challenges, ongoing negotiations represent a significant step towards resolving the conflict. While territorial control remains a contentious issue, the current dialogue signifies a substantial effort towards peace. Further talks between the U.S., Ukraine, and Russia are anticipated as the parties work towards a comprehensive agreement.